Chrigee
Joined 15-08-2015 Was _Chrigee_
26,236,436 score to level 45
- Global
- -
- pp
- 0pp
- Swiss #1s
- 2
Swiss #1s
Statistics
Swiss ranks
- pp #8,537 0pp
- Accuracy #1,417 97.74%
- Plays #4,897 2,009
- Level #3,575 44.32
- Ranked score #5,479 207,903,303
- Total score #6,466 571,063,564
- Medals #125 14
- Replays watched #187 0
- Maps played #2,459 464
- Account age #13,144 #6,934,887
- #1s #236 2
- Weighted pp #3,732 23pp
- Average pp #4,013 11pp
- Average SR #4,817 2.10*
- Average accuracy #475 98.54%
- Average score #3,929 1,102,002
- Total score #3,707 2,204,004
- Oldest #1 #900 Takahashi Chiaki, Hara Yumi, Asakura Azumi, Hasegawa Akiko - GOODNIGHT*STARS [Collab E@sy] (01-09-2015)
- Global #1s #9 0
Medals
14 of 352
Beatmap Challenge Packs 0/7
Beatmap Packs 0/80
Beatmap Spotlights 0/22
Hush-Hush 2/70
Hush-Hush (Expert) 1/64
Mod Introduction 2/13
Skill & Dedication 9/96
Top plays over time
Nothing at that depth yet. A career is ranked against itself in the background, so the first look can come up empty.
The figure is what the play was worth when it reached its best place, under the pp system live then; in brackets is what osu! says it is worth today, where a rework has moved it. A play's place can only get worse while a pp system runs, so the place shown is the one it reached the moment it arrived: when it was set, or when a rework re-priced everything in its favour. Plays osu! has dropped are here too, from what osu!track saw. These values are reconstructed, not osu!'s own. osu! does not publish what a play was worth in the past, so every historical figure here is recomputed from the map file under the pp system of the day, and lands within a few pp of the real number rather than on it. Two plays within about 5% of each other can therefore be listed the wrong way round.