Nudel_phuong
Joined 08-09-2015
78,372,856 score to level 83
- Global
- -
- pp
- 0pp
- Swiss #1s
- 1
Swiss #1s
Statistics
Swiss ranks
- pp #8,386 0pp
- Accuracy #2,934 96.45%
- Plays #1,952 9,263
- Level #1,210 82.42
- Ranked score #2,498 892,591,986
- Total score #2,541 3,699,886,490
- Medals #124 14
- Replays watched #185 0
- Maps played #2,055 868
- Account age #13,426 #7,059,052
- #1s #238 1
- Weighted pp #3,661 24pp
- Average pp #2,613 24pp
- Average SR #2,331 3.25*
- Average accuracy #2,379 95.16%
- Average score #3,436 1,423,569
- Total score #4,141 1,423,569
- Oldest #1 #1,048 Touyama Nao, Hanazawa Kana, Komatsu Mikako, Asumi Kana - Aimai Hertz TVsize ver. [Mochi's Hard] (09-03-2016)
- Global #1s #9 0
Medals
14 of 352
Beatmap Challenge Packs 0/7
Beatmap Packs 0/80
Beatmap Spotlights 0/22
Hush-Hush 1/70
Hush-Hush (Expert) 0/64
Mod Introduction 2/13
Skill & Dedication 11/96
Top plays over time
Nothing at that depth yet. A career is ranked against itself in the background, so the first look can come up empty.
The figure is what the play was worth when it reached its best place, under the pp system live then; in brackets is what osu! says it is worth today, where a rework has moved it. A play's place can only get worse while a pp system runs, so the place shown is the one it reached the moment it arrived: when it was set, or when a rework re-priced everything in its favour. Plays osu! has dropped are here too, from what osu!track saw. These values are reconstructed, not osu!'s own. osu! does not publish what a play was worth in the past, so every historical figure here is recomputed from the map file under the pp system of the day, and lands within a few pp of the real number rather than on it. Two plays within about 5% of each other can therefore be listed the wrong way round.