_dve_old
Joined 27-09-2015
85,704,548 score to level 72
- Global
- -
- pp
- 0pp
- Swiss #1s
- 1
Swiss #1s
Statistics
Swiss ranks
- pp #8,381 0pp
- Accuracy #564 98.59%
- Plays #5,622 1,220
- Level #1,737 71.15
- Ranked score #2,485 903,575,006
- Total score #3,255 2,376,576,898
- Medals #132 6
- Replays watched #185 0
- Maps played #2,610 306
- Account age #13,660 #7,150,487
- #1s #239 1
- Weighted pp #3,025 42pp
- Average pp #1,497 42pp
- Average SR #2,702 3.01*
- Average accuracy #165 99.22%
- Average score #1,452 3,740,294
- Total score #3,137 3,740,294
- Oldest #1 #924 Meg & Dia - Here, Here and Here [Hard] (30-09-2015)
- Global #1s #9 0
Medals
6 of 352
Beatmap Challenge Packs 0/7
Beatmap Packs 0/80
Beatmap Spotlights 0/22
Hush-Hush 2/70
Hush-Hush (Expert) 0/64
Mod Introduction 0/13
Skill & Dedication 4/96
Top plays over time
Nothing at that depth yet. A career is ranked against itself in the background, so the first look can come up empty.
The figure is what the play was worth when it reached its best place, under the pp system live then; in brackets is what osu! says it is worth today, where a rework has moved it. A play's place can only get worse while a pp system runs, so the place shown is the one it reached the moment it arrived: when it was set, or when a rework re-priced everything in its favour. Plays osu! has dropped are here too, from what osu!track saw. These values are reconstructed, not osu!'s own. osu! does not publish what a play was worth in the past, so every historical figure here is recomputed from the map file under the pp system of the day, and lands within a few pp of the real number rather than on it. Two plays within about 5% of each other can therefore be listed the wrong way round.