gilles3
Joined 07-03-2011
46,127,646 score to level 59
- Global
- -
- pp
- 0pp
- Swiss #1s
- 1
Swiss #1s
Statistics
Swiss ranks
- pp #8,567 0pp
- Accuracy #3,685 95.87%
- Plays #1,943 9,321
- Level #2,480 58.30
- Ranked score #3,971 394,086,887
- Total score #4,423 1,305,562,355
- Medals #134 5
- Replays watched #187 0
- Maps played #2,647 280
- Account age #441 #729,334
- #1s #243 1
- Weighted pp #3,868 20pp
- Average pp #2,979 20pp
- Average SR #3,928 2.48*
- Average accuracy #155 99.26%
- Average score #4,800 586,728
- Total score #4,930 586,728
- Oldest #1 #151 Iguchi Yuka, Kitamura Eri & Ise Mariya - Kimi ni Gohoushi (TV Size) [Easy] (27-10-2011)
- Global #1s #9 0
Medals
5 of 352
Beatmap Challenge Packs 0/7
Beatmap Packs 0/80
Beatmap Spotlights 0/22
Hush-Hush 2/70
Hush-Hush (Expert) 0/64
Mod Introduction 0/13
Skill & Dedication 3/96
Top plays over time
Nothing at that depth yet. A career is ranked against itself in the background, so the first look can come up empty.
The figure is what the play was worth when it reached its best place, under the pp system live then; in brackets is what osu! says it is worth today, where a rework has moved it. A play's place can only get worse while a pp system runs, so the place shown is the one it reached the moment it arrived: when it was set, or when a rework re-priced everything in its favour. Plays osu! has dropped are here too, from what osu!track saw. These values are reconstructed, not osu!'s own. osu! does not publish what a play was worth in the past, so every historical figure here is recomputed from the map file under the pp system of the day, and lands within a few pp of the real number rather than on it. Two plays within about 5% of each other can therefore be listed the wrong way round.