lordkif
Joined 27-10-2015
20,439,877 score to level 67
- Global
- -
- pp
- 0pp
- Swiss #1s
- 1
Swiss #1s
Statistics
Swiss ranks
- pp #8,386 0pp
- Accuracy #16,181 89.20%
- Plays #2,146 8,294
- Level #1,983 66.76
- Ranked score #4,358 325,187,703
- Total score #3,597 1,962,090,200
- Medals #120 18
- Replays watched #185 0
- Maps played #2,143 778
- Account age #14,207 #7,323,625
- #1s #238 1
- Weighted pp #3,583 26pp
- Average pp #2,467 26pp
- Average SR #2,902 2.89*
- Average accuracy #304 98.90%
- Average score #4,526 736,312
- Total score #4,748 736,312
- Oldest #1 #2,380 Shikata Akiko - Katayoku no Tori [Normal] (17-08-2020)
- Global #1s #9 0
Medals
18 of 352
Beatmap Challenge Packs 0/7
Beatmap Packs 0/80
Beatmap Spotlights 0/22
Hush-Hush 1/70
Hush-Hush (Expert) 3/64
Mod Introduction 5/13
Skill & Dedication 9/96
Top plays over time
Nothing at that depth yet. A career is ranked against itself in the background, so the first look can come up empty.
The figure is what the play was worth when it reached its best place, under the pp system live then; in brackets is what osu! says it is worth today, where a rework has moved it. A play's place can only get worse while a pp system runs, so the place shown is the one it reached the moment it arrived: when it was set, or when a rework re-priced everything in its favour. Plays osu! has dropped are here too, from what osu!track saw. These values are reconstructed, not osu!'s own. osu! does not publish what a play was worth in the past, so every historical figure here is recomputed from the map file under the pp system of the day, and lands within a few pp of the real number rather than on it. Two plays within about 5% of each other can therefore be listed the wrong way round.