bryan4740
Joined 05-11-2015
64,379,997 score to level 72
- Global
- -
- pp
- 0pp
- Swiss #1s
- 4
Swiss #1s
Statistics
Swiss ranks
- pp #8,458 0pp
- Accuracy #4,805 95.11%
- Plays #2,740 6,075
- Level #1,727 71.36
- Ranked score #3,020 638,111,562
- Total score #3,243 2,397,901,449
- Medals #114 24
- Replays watched #186 0
- Maps played #2,254 665
- Account age #14,326 #7,370,328
- #1s #231 4
- Weighted pp #2,549 66pp
- Average pp #3,221 18pp
- Average SR #3,940 2.47*
- Average accuracy #1,541 96.82%
- Average score #4,052 1,023,631
- Total score #3,040 4,094,522
- Oldest #1 #1,002 AKITO - Sakura Kagetsu [Luka's Easy] (12-01-2016)
- Global #1s #9 0
Medals
24 of 352
Beatmap Challenge Packs 0/7
Beatmap Packs 0/80
Beatmap Spotlights 0/22
Hush-Hush 4/70
Hush-Hush (Expert) 0/64
Mod Introduction 5/13
Skill & Dedication 15/96
Top plays over time
Nothing at that depth yet. A career is ranked against itself in the background, so the first look can come up empty.
The figure is what the play was worth when it reached its best place, under the pp system live then; in brackets is what osu! says it is worth today, where a rework has moved it. A play's place can only get worse while a pp system runs, so the place shown is the one it reached the moment it arrived: when it was set, or when a rework re-priced everything in its favour. Plays osu! has dropped are here too, from what osu!track saw. These values are reconstructed, not osu!'s own. osu! does not publish what a play was worth in the past, so every historical figure here is recomputed from the map file under the pp system of the day, and lands within a few pp of the real number rather than on it. Two plays within about 5% of each other can therefore be listed the wrong way round.