Grindelo

Joined 22-03-2011

Level 59 63%

25,340,440 score to level 60

Global
-
Country
-
peak #184 4 Jun 2014
pp
0pp
Swiss #1s
11

Swiss #1s

#1s
11
#229 in CH
Also world #1
0
#9 in CH
Weighted pp
226pp
#1,486 in CH
Average pp
24pp
#2,557 in CH
Average SR
2.39*
#4,148 in CH
Average accuracy
98.84%
#329 in CH
Last 7 days
+0 / -0
gained / lost
Last 30 days
+0 / -0
gained / lost

Statistics

Statistics
Ranked score
406,640,131
Hit accuracy
98.70%
Play count
2,473
Play time
46h
Total score
1,396,559,561
Total hits
340,681
Maximum combo
1,132
Replays watched by others
2
Medals
10
SS
8
SS
26
S
19
S
120
A
119
About
read 19d ago
Playstyle
mouse, keyboard
Followers
1
Mapping followers
0
Kudosu
0
Forum posts
0
Maps played
226
Global rank, 90 days

1d ago #329,715

Play history
Replays watched

Swiss ranks

Medals

10 of 352

Beatmap Challenge Packs 0/7

Beatmap Packs 0/80

Beatmap Spotlights 0/22

Hush-Hush 3/70

Hush-Hush (Expert) 0/64

Mod Introduction 0/13

Skill & Dedication 7/96

Rank history

Not enough days recorded.

Monthly pp since 2014

01-09-2026 #4,634

Rebuilt on the first of each month from the scores I hold, under the pp system live then. Bonus pp is an estimate. Every Swiss player that month

Top plays over time

Nothing at that depth yet. A career is ranked against itself in the background, so the first look can come up empty.

The figure is what the play was worth when it reached its best place, under the pp system live then; in brackets is what osu! says it is worth today, where a rework has moved it. A play's place can only get worse while a pp system runs, so the place shown is the one it reached the moment it arrived: when it was set, or when a rework re-priced everything in its favour. Plays osu! has dropped are here too, from what osu!track saw. These values are reconstructed, not osu!'s own. osu! does not publish what a play was worth in the past, so every historical figure here is recomputed from the map file under the pp system of the day, and lands within a few pp of the real number rather than on it. Two plays within about 5% of each other can therefore be listed the wrong way round.