davide_ch
Joined 17-01-2016
4,266,730 score to level 18
- Global
- -
- pp
- 0pp
- Swiss #1s
- 1
Swiss #1s
Statistics
Swiss ranks
- pp #8,592 0pp
- Accuracy #13,973 90.24%
- Plays #6,707 152
- Level #6,187 17.28
- Ranked score #14,693 19,630,257
- Total score #19,159 32,963,270
- Medals #138 1
- Replays watched #187 0
- Maps played #2,847 76
- Account age #15,346 #7,773,863
- #1s #241 1
- Weighted pp #5,458 1pp
- Average pp #5,454 1pp
- Average SR #5,200 1.87*
- Average accuracy #4,947 75.86%
- Average score #5,205 351,363
- Total score #5,239 351,363
- Oldest #1 #1,011 Hwayobi - Bye Bye Bye [llkey's Normal] (23-01-2016)
- Global #1s #9 0
Medals
1 of 352
Beatmap Challenge Packs 0/7
Beatmap Packs 0/80
Beatmap Spotlights 0/22
Hush-Hush 1/70
Hush-Hush (Expert) 0/64
Mod Introduction 0/13
Skill & Dedication 0/96
Top plays over time
Nothing at that depth yet. A career is ranked against itself in the background, so the first look can come up empty.
The figure is what the play was worth when it reached its best place, under the pp system live then; in brackets is what osu! says it is worth today, where a rework has moved it. A play's place can only get worse while a pp system runs, so the place shown is the one it reached the moment it arrived: when it was set, or when a rework re-priced everything in its favour. Plays osu! has dropped are here too, from what osu!track saw. These values are reconstructed, not osu!'s own. osu! does not publish what a play was worth in the past, so every historical figure here is recomputed from the map file under the pp system of the day, and lands within a few pp of the real number rather than on it. Two plays within about 5% of each other can therefore be listed the wrong way round.