Swiss #1s
Statistics
Swiss ranks
- pp #8,482 0pp
- Accuracy #16,362 89.11%
- Plays #6,054 787
- Level #4,700 32.26
- Ranked score #8,624 73,420,505
- Total score #9,574 218,743,718
- Medals #117 21
- Replays watched #186 0
- Maps played #2,749 167
- Account age #15,663 #7,927,412
- #1s #236 1
- Weighted pp #5,269 3pp
- Average pp #5,238 3pp
- Average SR #2,578 3.09*
- Average accuracy #5,179 56.53%
- Average score #5,513 60,981
- Total score #5,515 60,981
- Oldest #1 #3,378 Richard Stone - Animaniacs Intro [Hard] (25-06-2022)
- Global #1s #9 0
Medals
21 of 352
Beatmap Challenge Packs 0/7
Beatmap Packs 0/80
Beatmap Spotlights 0/22
Hush-Hush 3/70
Hush-Hush (Expert) 1/64
Mod Introduction 9/13
Skill & Dedication 8/96
Beatmaps
The sets this player has favourited on osu!. Read when I last swept them, so a very recent upload can be missing.
Gorillaz - Clint Eastwood 3 difficulties- Mapper
- Agent Spin Here
- Status
- ranked
- Hardest
- 3.54*
- Plays
- 1,557,813
- Favourites
- 2,488
- Ranked
- 10-01-2010
u's - Super LOVE=Super LIVE! 1 difficulty- Mapper
- Toshino Kyoko
- Status
- ranked
- Hardest
- 5.86*
- Plays
- 160,290
- Favourites
- 287
- Ranked
- 10-07-2017
Top plays over time
Nothing at that depth yet. A career is ranked against itself in the background, so the first look can come up empty.
The figure is what the play was worth when it reached its best place, under the pp system live then; in brackets is what osu! says it is worth today, where a rework has moved it. A play's place can only get worse while a pp system runs, so the place shown is the one it reached the moment it arrived: when it was set, or when a rework re-priced everything in its favour. Plays osu! has dropped are here too, from what osu!track saw. These values are reconstructed, not osu!'s own. osu! does not publish what a play was worth in the past, so every historical figure here is recomputed from the map file under the pp system of the day, and lands within a few pp of the real number rather than on it. Two plays within about 5% of each other can therefore be listed the wrong way round.































































































































































































































































































































































