a8528008
Joined 21-02-2016
47,331 score to level 36
- Global
- -
- pp
- 0pp
- Swiss #1s
- 2
Swiss #1s
Statistics
Swiss ranks
- pp #8,562 0pp
- Accuracy #4,311 95.44%
- Plays #5,928 919
- Level #4,319 35.99
- Ranked score #7,864 91,840,687
- Total score #8,411 304,452,669
- Medals #130 9
- Replays watched #187 0
- Maps played #2,764 163
- Account age #15,797 #7,976,403
- #1s #241 2
- Weighted pp #4,454 11pp
- Average pp #4,862 6pp
- Average SR #5,476 1.55*
- Average accuracy #377 98.76%
- Average score #4,660 668,010
- Total score #4,225 1,336,020
- Oldest #1 #1,041 Hitomi Shimatani - Falco [Normal] (02-03-2016)
- Global #1s #9 0
Medals
9 of 352
Beatmap Challenge Packs 0/7
Beatmap Packs 0/80
Beatmap Spotlights 0/22
Hush-Hush 2/70
Hush-Hush (Expert) 0/64
Mod Introduction 1/13
Skill & Dedication 6/96
Top plays over time
Nothing at that depth yet. A career is ranked against itself in the background, so the first look can come up empty.
The figure is what the play was worth when it reached its best place, under the pp system live then; in brackets is what osu! says it is worth today, where a rework has moved it. A play's place can only get worse while a pp system runs, so the place shown is the one it reached the moment it arrived: when it was set, or when a rework re-priced everything in its favour. Plays osu! has dropped are here too, from what osu!track saw. These values are reconstructed, not osu!'s own. osu! does not publish what a play was worth in the past, so every historical figure here is recomputed from the map file under the pp system of the day, and lands within a few pp of the real number rather than on it. Two plays within about 5% of each other can therefore be listed the wrong way round.