Mitzer5
Joined 11-04-2016
23,975,605 score to level 36
- Global
- -
- pp
- 0pp
- Swiss #1s
- 1
Swiss #1s
Statistics
Swiss ranks
- pp #8,430 0pp
- Accuracy #7,102 93.68%
- Plays #4,815 2,107
- Level #4,422 35.03
- Ranked score #8,223 82,445,105
- Total score #8,667 280,524,395
- Medals #122 16
- Replays watched #185 0
- Maps played #2,340 580
- Account age #16,406 #8,241,817
- #1s #242 1
- Weighted pp #4,760 7pp
- Average pp #4,572 7pp
- Average SR #3,983 2.45*
- Average accuracy #2,797 94.20%
- Average score #5,416 208,197
- Total score #5,425 208,197
- Oldest #1 #1,868 IU - Nae Kkumeun Patissiere [Easy] (26-01-2019)
- Global #1s #9 0
Medals
16 of 352
Beatmap Challenge Packs 0/7
Beatmap Packs 0/80
Beatmap Spotlights 0/22
Hush-Hush 2/70
Hush-Hush (Expert) 1/64
Mod Introduction 6/13
Skill & Dedication 7/96
Top plays over time
Nothing at that depth yet. A career is ranked against itself in the background, so the first look can come up empty.
The figure is what the play was worth when it reached its best place, under the pp system live then; in brackets is what osu! says it is worth today, where a rework has moved it. A play's place can only get worse while a pp system runs, so the place shown is the one it reached the moment it arrived: when it was set, or when a rework re-priced everything in its favour. Plays osu! has dropped are here too, from what osu!track saw. These values are reconstructed, not osu!'s own. osu! does not publish what a play was worth in the past, so every historical figure here is recomputed from the map file under the pp system of the day, and lands within a few pp of the real number rather than on it. Two plays within about 5% of each other can therefore be listed the wrong way round.