FireViper
Joined 08-05-2016
14,022,259 score to level 35
- Global
- -
- pp
- 0pp
- Swiss #1s
- 1
Swiss #1s
Statistics
Swiss ranks
- pp #8,433 0pp
- Accuracy #1,565 97.61%
- Plays #6,008 826
- Level #4,483 34.40
- Ranked score #7,242 110,285,018
- Total score #8,861 265,627,741
- Medals #126 12
- Replays watched #185 0
- Maps played #2,739 180
- Account age #16,744 #8,374,115
- #1s #240 1
- Weighted pp #4,518 10pp
- Average pp #4,177 10pp
- Average SR #4,862 2.07*
- Average accuracy #321 98.87%
- Average score #4,819 574,501
- Total score #4,938 574,501
- Oldest #1 #1,126 Tomatsu Haruka & Horie Yui - Kami-sama to Issho (TV Size) [Normal] (23-06-2016)
- Global #1s #9 0
Medals
12 of 352
Beatmap Challenge Packs 0/7
Beatmap Packs 0/80
Beatmap Spotlights 0/22
Hush-Hush 2/70
Hush-Hush (Expert) 1/64
Mod Introduction 2/13
Skill & Dedication 7/96
Top plays over time
Nothing at that depth yet. A career is ranked against itself in the background, so the first look can come up empty.
The figure is what the play was worth when it reached its best place, under the pp system live then; in brackets is what osu! says it is worth today, where a rework has moved it. A play's place can only get worse while a pp system runs, so the place shown is the one it reached the moment it arrived: when it was set, or when a rework re-priced everything in its favour. Plays osu! has dropped are here too, from what osu!track saw. These values are reconstructed, not osu!'s own. osu! does not publish what a play was worth in the past, so every historical figure here is recomputed from the map file under the pp system of the day, and lands within a few pp of the real number rather than on it. Two plays within about 5% of each other can therefore be listed the wrong way round.