StoneyBridge63
Joined 17-05-2016
177,726,059 score to level 96
- Global
- -
- pp
- 0pp
- Swiss #1s
- 1
Swiss #1s
Statistics
Swiss ranks
- pp #8,424 0pp
- Accuracy #2,032 97.19%
- Plays #1,708 10,540
- Level #541 95.82
- Ranked score #2,246 1,062,857,869
- Total score #1,583 7,609,448,727
- Medals #111 27
- Replays watched #185 0
- Maps played #2,208 712
- Account age #16,853 #8,418,012
- #1s #243 1
- Weighted pp #5,042 5pp
- Average pp #4,962 5pp
- Average SR #4,810 2.10*
- Average accuracy #3,335 92.47%
- Average score #2,770 1,967,601
- Total score #3,809 1,967,601
- Oldest #1 #1,139 Kuwashima Houko - Kioku [Raki] (09-07-2016)
- Global #1s #9 0
Medals
27 of 352
Beatmap Challenge Packs 0/7
Beatmap Packs 0/80
Beatmap Spotlights 0/22
Hush-Hush 4/70
Hush-Hush (Expert) 0/64
Mod Introduction 5/13
Skill & Dedication 18/96
Top plays over time
Nothing at that depth yet. A career is ranked against itself in the background, so the first look can come up empty.
The figure is what the play was worth when it reached its best place, under the pp system live then; in brackets is what osu! says it is worth today, where a rework has moved it. A play's place can only get worse while a pp system runs, so the place shown is the one it reached the moment it arrived: when it was set, or when a rework re-priced everything in its favour. Plays osu! has dropped are here too, from what osu!track saw. These values are reconstructed, not osu!'s own. osu! does not publish what a play was worth in the past, so every historical figure here is recomputed from the map file under the pp system of the day, and lands within a few pp of the real number rather than on it. Two plays within about 5% of each other can therefore be listed the wrong way round.