Dragonfeyer

Joined 12-06-2016

Level 16 76%

1,241,735 score to level 17

Global
-
Country
-
peak #6,133 25 Jun 2016
pp
0pp
Swiss #1s
0

Swiss #1s

#1s
0
#243 in CH
Also world #1
0
#9 in CH
Weighted pp
-
Average pp
-
Average SR
-
Average accuracy
-
Last 7 days
+0 / -0
gained / lost
Last 30 days
+0 / -0
gained / lost

Statistics

Statistics
Ranked score
5,872,154
Hit accuracy
86.63%
Play count
205
Play time
3h
Total score
30,038,265
Total hits
19,094
Maximum combo
242
Replays watched by others
0
Medals
6
Highest rank
#1,250,824
SS
0
SS
0
S
0
S
1
A
5
About
read 19d ago

Nothing filled in.

Followers
1
Mapping followers
0
Kudosu
0
Forum posts
0
Maps played
34
Global rank, 90 days

1d ago #2,505,389

Play history
Replays watched

Nobody has watched a replay of this player.

Swiss ranks

Medals

6 of 352

Beatmap Challenge Packs 0/7

Beatmap Packs 0/80

Beatmap Spotlights 0/22

Hush-Hush 1/70

Hush-Hush (Expert) 0/64

Mod Introduction 1/13

Skill & Dedication 4/96

Rank history

Not enough days recorded.

Monthly pp since 2014

01-09-2026 #22,819

Rebuilt on the first of each month from the scores I hold, under the pp system live then. Bonus pp is an estimate. Every Swiss player that month

Top plays over time

Nothing at that depth yet. A career is ranked against itself in the background, so the first look can come up empty.

The figure is what the play was worth when it reached its best place, under the pp system live then; in brackets is what osu! says it is worth today, where a rework has moved it. A play's place can only get worse while a pp system runs, so the place shown is the one it reached the moment it arrived: when it was set, or when a rework re-priced everything in its favour. Plays osu! has dropped are here too, from what osu!track saw. These values are reconstructed, not osu!'s own. osu! does not publish what a play was worth in the past, so every historical figure here is recomputed from the map file under the pp system of the day, and lands within a few pp of the real number rather than on it. Two plays within about 5% of each other can therefore be listed the wrong way round.