Un1corn94
SupporterJoined 27-06-2016 Was fnatickevin
65,966,120 score to level 71
- Global
- -
- pp
- 0pp
- Swiss #1s
- 6
Swiss #1s
Statistics
Swiss ranks
- pp #8,424 0pp
- Accuracy #9,975 92.13%
- Plays #2,999 5,372
- Level #1,779 70.33
- Ranked score #1,923 1,348,739,411
- Total score #3,312 2,294,784,683
- Medals #108 30
- Replays watched #185 0
- Maps played #1,240 1,893
- Account age #17,421 #8,622,620
- #1s #237 6
- Weighted pp #1,939 127pp
- Average pp #2,635 24pp
- Average SR #3,178 2.77*
- Average accuracy #2,062 95.89%
- Average score #2,553 2,196,183
- Total score #1,912 13,177,100
- Oldest #1 #1,200 A Rocket To The Moon - Annabelle [Normal] (17-10-2016)
- Global #1s #9 0
Medals
30 of 352
Beatmap Challenge Packs 0/7
Beatmap Packs 0/80
Beatmap Spotlights 0/22
Hush-Hush 5/70
Hush-Hush (Expert) 2/64
Mod Introduction 5/13
Skill & Dedication 18/96
Top plays over time
Nothing at that depth yet. A career is ranked against itself in the background, so the first look can come up empty.
The figure is what the play was worth when it reached its best place, under the pp system live then; in brackets is what osu! says it is worth today, where a rework has moved it. A play's place can only get worse while a pp system runs, so the place shown is the one it reached the moment it arrived: when it was set, or when a rework re-priced everything in its favour. Plays osu! has dropped are here too, from what osu!track saw. These values are reconstructed, not osu!'s own. osu! does not publish what a play was worth in the past, so every historical figure here is recomputed from the map file under the pp system of the day, and lands within a few pp of the real number rather than on it. Two plays within about 5% of each other can therefore be listed the wrong way round.