NeverJenni
Joined 07-08-2016
3,217,518 score to level 24
- Global
- -
- pp
- 0pp
- Swiss #1s
- 2
Swiss #1s
Statistics
Swiss ranks
- pp #8,401 0pp
- Accuracy #2,292 96.98%
- Plays #6,322 499
- Level #5,536 23.70
- Ranked score #9,594 56,225,635
- Total score #13,629 86,022,482
- Medals #123 15
- Replays watched #185 0
- Maps played #2,684 232
- Account age #17,851 #8,815,255
- #1s #238 2
- Weighted pp #4,034 17pp
- Average pp #4,371 9pp
- Average SR #4,590 2.20*
- Average accuracy #2,784 94.23%
- Average score #5,250 312,876
- Total score #4,865 625,752
- Oldest #1 #1,268 Miho Morikawa - Blue Water (TV Size) [Easy] (17-01-2017)
- Global #1s #9 0
Medals
15 of 352
Beatmap Challenge Packs 0/7
Beatmap Packs 0/80
Beatmap Spotlights 0/22
Hush-Hush 5/70
Hush-Hush (Expert) 0/64
Mod Introduction 5/13
Skill & Dedication 5/96
Top plays over time
Nothing at that depth yet. A career is ranked against itself in the background, so the first look can come up empty.
The figure is what the play was worth when it reached its best place, under the pp system live then; in brackets is what osu! says it is worth today, where a rework has moved it. A play's place can only get worse while a pp system runs, so the place shown is the one it reached the moment it arrived: when it was set, or when a rework re-priced everything in its favour. Plays osu! has dropped are here too, from what osu!track saw. These values are reconstructed, not osu!'s own. osu! does not publish what a play was worth in the past, so every historical figure here is recomputed from the map file under the pp system of the day, and lands within a few pp of the real number rather than on it. Two plays within about 5% of each other can therefore be listed the wrong way round.