Scrat1234

Joined 18-11-2016

Level 98 18%

4,258,124,074 score to level 99

Global
-
Country
-
peak #254 19 Dec 2018
pp
0pp
Swiss #1s
0

Swiss #1s

#1s
0
#240 in CH
Also world #1
0
#9 in CH
Weighted pp
-
Average pp
-
Average SR
-
Average accuracy
-
Last 7 days
+0 / -0
gained / lost
Last 30 days
+0 / -0
gained / lost

Statistics

Statistics
Ranked score
2,918,506,517
Hit accuracy
96.62%
Play count
19,988
Play time
313h
Total score
13,447,305,275
Total hits
3,998,896
Maximum combo
1,288
Replays watched by others
3
Medals
38
Highest rank
#67,982
SS
1
SS
17
S
8
S
172
A
488
About
read 19d ago
Playstyle
mouse, keyboard
Followers
19
Mapping followers
0
Kudosu
0
Forum posts
0
Maps played
2,763
Global rank, 90 days

1d ago #196,781

Play history
Replays watched

Swiss ranks

Medals

38 of 352

Beatmap Challenge Packs 0/7

Beatmap Packs 0/80

Beatmap Spotlights 0/22

Hush-Hush 7/70

Hush-Hush (Expert) 3/64

Mod Introduction 7/13

Skill & Dedication 21/96

Rank history

Not enough days recorded.

Monthly pp since 2014

01-09-2026 #822

Rebuilt on the first of each month from the scores I hold, under the pp system live then. Bonus pp is an estimate. Every Swiss player that month

Top plays over time

Nothing at that depth yet. A career is ranked against itself in the background, so the first look can come up empty.

The figure is what the play was worth when it reached its best place, under the pp system live then; in brackets is what osu! says it is worth today, where a rework has moved it. A play's place can only get worse while a pp system runs, so the place shown is the one it reached the moment it arrived: when it was set, or when a rework re-priced everything in its favour. Plays osu! has dropped are here too, from what osu!track saw. These values are reconstructed, not osu!'s own. osu! does not publish what a play was worth in the past, so every historical figure here is recomputed from the map file under the pp system of the day, and lands within a few pp of the real number rather than on it. Two plays within about 5% of each other can therefore be listed the wrong way round.