DarkLink668

Joined 11-01-2017

Level 53 67%

18,669,251 score to level 54

Global
#870,526
Country
#2,668
peak #1,159 18 Jun 2017
pp
1,011pp
Swiss #1s
0

Swiss #1s

#1s
0
#241 in CH
Also world #1
0
#9 in CH
Weighted pp
-
Average pp
-
Average SR
-
Average accuracy
-
Last 7 days
+0 / -0
gained / lost
Last 30 days
+0 / -0
gained / lost

Statistics

Statistics
Ranked score
344,920,351
Hit accuracy
95.52%
Play count
1,113
Play time
26h
Total score
1,016,420,749
Total hits
269,903
Maximum combo
844
Replays watched by others
0
Medals
21
Highest rank
#409,896
SS
0
SS
0
S
1
S
37
A
81
About
read 15d ago

Nothing filled in.

Followers
5
Mapping followers
0
Kudosu
0
Forum posts
0
Maps played
321
Global rank, 90 days

today #854,203

Play history
Replays watched

Nobody has watched a replay of this player.

Swiss ranks

Medals

21 of 352

Beatmap Challenge Packs 0/7

Beatmap Packs 0/80

Beatmap Spotlights 0/22

Hush-Hush 6/70

Hush-Hush (Expert) 2/64

Mod Introduction 3/13

Skill & Dedication 10/96

Rank history

22-09-2026 #870,526

Monthly pp since 2014

01-09-2026 #5,001

Rebuilt on the first of each month from the scores I hold, under the pp system live then. Bonus pp is an estimate. Every Swiss player that month

Top plays over time

Nothing at that depth yet. A career is ranked against itself in the background, so the first look can come up empty.

The figure is what the play was worth when it reached its best place, under the pp system live then; in brackets is what osu! says it is worth today, where a rework has moved it. A play's place can only get worse while a pp system runs, so the place shown is the one it reached the moment it arrived: when it was set, or when a rework re-priced everything in its favour. Plays osu! has dropped are here too, from what osu!track saw. These values are reconstructed, not osu!'s own. osu! does not publish what a play was worth in the past, so every historical figure here is recomputed from the map file under the pp system of the day, and lands within a few pp of the real number rather than on it. Two plays within about 5% of each other can therefore be listed the wrong way round.