Kilja_old

Joined 06-03-2017

Level 18 83%

1,111,462 score to level 19

Global
-
Country
-
peak #7,259 19 Dec 2018
pp
0pp
Swiss #1s
0

Swiss #1s

#1s
0
#242 in CH
Also world #1
0
#9 in CH
Weighted pp
-
Average pp
-
Average SR
-
Average accuracy
-
Last 7 days
+0 / -0
gained / lost
Last 30 days
+0 / -0
gained / lost

Statistics

Statistics
Ranked score
13,953,339
Hit accuracy
80.91%
Play count
160
Play time
5h
Total score
42,778,538
Total hits
38,384
Maximum combo
541
Replays watched by others
0
Medals
6
Highest rank
#1,544,361
SS
0
SS
0
S
0
S
1
A
1
About
read 31d ago

Nothing filled in.

Followers
0
Mapping followers
0
Kudosu
0
Forum posts
0
Maps played
54
Global rank, 90 days

1d ago #2,156,118

Play history
Replays watched

Nobody has watched a replay of this player.

Swiss ranks

Medals

6 of 352

Beatmap Challenge Packs 0/7

Beatmap Packs 0/80

Beatmap Spotlights 0/22

Hush-Hush 0/70

Hush-Hush (Expert) 0/64

Mod Introduction 2/13

Skill & Dedication 4/96

Rank history

Not enough days recorded.

Monthly pp since 2014

01-09-2026 #17,268

Rebuilt on the first of each month from the scores I hold, under the pp system live then. Bonus pp is an estimate. Every Swiss player that month

Top plays over time

Nothing at that depth yet. A career is ranked against itself in the background, so the first look can come up empty.

The figure is what the play was worth when it reached its best place, under the pp system live then; in brackets is what osu! says it is worth today, where a rework has moved it. A play's place can only get worse while a pp system runs, so the place shown is the one it reached the moment it arrived: when it was set, or when a rework re-priced everything in its favour. Plays osu! has dropped are here too, from what osu!track saw. These values are reconstructed, not osu!'s own. osu! does not publish what a play was worth in the past, so every historical figure here is recomputed from the map file under the pp system of the day, and lands within a few pp of the real number rather than on it. Two plays within about 5% of each other can therefore be listed the wrong way round.